Journal Menu
Submit Manuscript via ScholarOne

Eurasian Journal of Anthropology
Volume 7, Issue 2 (December 2016), pp. 29-36

DOI: 10.12973/eja.2016.00054a

Downloaded 1075 times.

Research Article

Published online on Dec 27, 2016

How to reference this article?

 

Preference of Son and Reproductive Profile of Three Endogamous Tribes of Arunachal Pradesh, India

Mohammad Asghar, Engam Basar, Mukhi Savetary, & Pingku Nonang

Abstract

The fertility of a population is always influenced by various factors, directly or indirectly and these factors are, however, not the same for every population. The present study is an attempt to validate the various biological and social factors including son preference that influence the fertility among the three endogamous tribes of Arunachal Pradesh – Galo, Adi and Hills Miri. In together 624 ever married women were interviewed from both rural and urban areas using pre-tested schedule. It is found that one fourth of the male and one third of the female are marrying before the legal age at marriage among the study populations. It is higher among the rural compared to urban irrespective of gender and so the mean live birth among the rural are higher than the urban for all the study tribes. The age at marriage and age at first conception has inverse relation with the fertility. The mean live birth is higher among the illiterate mothers and house wife compared to literate and working mothers, respectively. The birth control users have a lower mean fertility compared to nonusers. Preference for son is observed among Galo and Hills Miri and gives an impact on fertility. Mother with lesser number of son have higher mean live birth.

Keywords: son preference, fertility, Arunachal Pradesh, reproductive profile


References
  1. Abelson, A. E. (1976). Altitude and fertility. Hum Biol, 48, 83–91.
  2. Choudhury, B., & Devi, M. (1997). Fertility differentials in Manipur: A study on the Meiteis and the Muslims. J Hum Ecol, 8, 51–59.
  3. Vlassoff, C. (1990). The value of sons in an Indian village: How widows see it. Pop Stud, 44, 5–20.
  4. Friedman, D., Hechter, M., & Kanazawa, S. (1994). A theory of the value of children. Demography, 31, 375–401.
  5. Raj, H. (2006). Fundamentals of Demography. Delhi, India: Surjeet Publication.
  6. Asghar, M., Murry, B., & Saraswathy, K. N. (2014). Fertility behaviour and effect of son preference among the Muslims of Manipur, India. J Anthropol. Retrieved from http://www.hindawi.com/ journals/janthro/2014/108236. doi:10.1155/2014/108236  
  7. Mukhopadhyay, B. (2001). Demographic characteristics and rural-urban residence among the Lepcha of Sikkim. In S. Sengupta (Eds), Tribes of the Eastern Himalayas. New Delhi, India: Mittal Publications, p 33-46.  
  8. Bulatao, R. A. (1981). Values and disvalues of children in successive childbearing decisions. Demography, 18, 1–25.
  9. Bangham, R. M., & Sacherer, J. M. (1980). Fertility of Nepalese Sherpas at moderate altitudes: comparison with high-altitude data. Ann Hum Biol, 7, 323–330.
  10. Mutharayappa, R., Choe, M. K., Arnold, F., & Roy, T. K. (1997). Son preference and its effect on fertility in India. National Family Health Survey Subject 3, Mumbai, India, IIPS.
  11. Srivastava, R. P., & Goswami, M. (1968). The menarcheal age of Assamese girls. Anthropologist, 15, 57–60.
  12. Chaudhuri, S. (2012). The desire for sons and excess fertility: a household-level analysis of parity progression in India. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health, 38, 178–186.
  13. Singh, S. J. (2006). Ethnic variation in fertility patterns among four communities of Manipur.  J Hum Ecol, 20, 1–9.