Journal Menu
Submit Manuscript via ScholarOne

EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education
Volume 12, Issue 8 (August 2016), pp. 2115-2137

DOI: 10.12973/eurasia.2016.1293a

Downloaded 2751 times.

Research Article

Published online on Jul 02, 2016

How to reference this article?

 

Effects of Problem-Based Learning on Attitude: A Meta-analysis Study

Melek Demirel & Miray Dağyar

Abstract

To date, researchers have frequently investigated students’ attitudes toward courses supported by problem-based learning. There are several studies with different results in the literature. It is necessary to combine and interpret the findings of these studies through a meta-analysis method. This method aims to combine different results of similar and independent studies through statistical techniques. Research findings of 47 studies that meet the criteria for meta-analysis are included in the meta-analysis of the study to determine the effects of problem-based learning on students’ attitudes as compared to traditional teaching. Also, some mediator variables are as follows: the status of a study, application time, education levels, scientific field of application, and sample size. As a result of the analysis, it has been found that problem-based learning has a low positive effect on students’ attitudes. It means that problem-based learning is effective in helping students gain a positive attitude toward courses.

Keywords: attitude, effect size, meta-analysis method, problem-based learning 


References
  1. Sign (+) refers to the studies included in the meta-analysis. 
  2. +Abdullah, N. I., Tarmizi, R. A. & Abu, R. (2010). The effects of problem based learning         on mathematics performance and affective attributes in learning statistics at form four secondary level. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 370–376. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.052.
  3. Abramson J. H. (1994). Making sense of data: A self-instructional manual on the     interpretation of epidemiological data. Oxford: Oxford University.
  4. Acar, S. (2011). Testing the effects of students' attitude towards the lesson based on computer       aided teaching in the field of physics chemistry biology and mathematics by the       method of meta analysis. (Unpublished Master Thesis), Yuzuncu Yıl University,       Turkey.
  5. +Akınoğlu, O. & Tandoğan, R. O. (2007). The effects of problem-based active learning in       science education on students’ academic achievement, attitude and concept learning.       Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(1), 71-81.       Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED495669.pdf.
  6. Albanese, M. & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: A review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Academic Medicine, 68(1), 52-81. Retrieved from http://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/Abstract/1993/01000/Problem based _Lear      ning__A_Review_of_Literature_on.20.aspx.
  7. Alper, A., Öztürk, S. & Akyol Aydın, C. (2014). Problem based learning studies in Turkey.       Ankara University, Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 47(1),  397-422.       Retrieved from http://dergiler.ankara.edu.tr/dergiler/40/1917/20127.pdf.
  8. Arends, R. I. (1998). Learning to teach. Boston, USA: McGrow Hill.
  9. +Aydoğdu, C. (2012). The effect of problem based learning strategy in electrolysis and       battery subject teaching. Hacettepe University Journal of Education 42, 48-59.       Retrieved from   http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/yonetim/icerik/makaleler/310-      published.pdf.
  10. Barrows, H. (2002). Is it truly possible to have such a thing as dPBL?. Distance Education, 23       (1), 119-122. doi:10.1080/01587910220124026.
  11. Batdı, V. (2014). The effects of a problem based learning approach on students' attitude        levels: A meta-analysis. Educational Research and Reviews, 9(9), 276-279. doi:       10.5897/ERR2014.1771.
  12. +Bayrak, R. (2007). Teaching solids by problem based learning. (Unpublished Doctoral       Thesis), Ataturk University, Turkey.
  13. +Bayram, A. (2010). The effect of problem based learning on overcoming 5th grade students       misconceptions about heat and temperature? (Unpublished Master Thesis), Selcuk       University, Turkey.
  14. +Benli, E. (2010). The research of the effects of problem based learning to the permanence of       information, the academic success of science teacher candidates and their attitudes       toward science. (Unpublished Master Thesis), Gazi University, Turkey.
  15. Beringer, J. (2007). Application of problem based learning through research investigation.       Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 31(3), 445-457.       doi:10.1080/03098260701514033
  16. Bloom, B. (1956). Bloom taxonomy of educational objectives: Book 1. New York: Longmans       Green.
  17. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L.V., Higgins, J.P.T. & Rothstein, H.R. (2013). Meta-analize       giriş.[Introduction to meta-analysis]. (Serkan Dinçer). Anı: Ankara.
  18. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L.V, Higgins, J.P.T. & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Computing effect         sizes for meta-analysis. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
  19. +Carll-Williamson, M. P. (2003). The effect of problem-based learning in high school       students enrolled in biology for the technologies as measured by concept of self and       attitude toward science. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis), University of South Carolina,       Columbia.
  20. Chang, C. (2001). Comparing the impacts of a problem-based computer-assisted instruction       and the direct-interactive teaching method on student science achievement. Journal of       Science Education and Technology, (2)10, 147-153. doi: 10.1023/A:1009469014218
  21. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. US: Lawrence,       Erlbaum.
  22. Colliver, J. A. (2000). Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula:  Research and       theory. Academic Medicine, 75(3), 259-266. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200003000-      00017.
  23. Cook, T. D., Cooper, H. M., Cordray, D.S., Hartmann, H., Hedges, L. V. Light, R. J., Louis,          T. A. & Mosteller, F. (1992). Meta-analysis for explanation: A casebook. Newyork:      Russell Sage.
  24. +Çakır, T. (2007). The effect of problem-based learning method on students' achievement,       retention and attitude in teaching the circle subjects that are in math course at       seventh grade in elementary school. (Unpublished Master Thesis), Balıkesir       University, Turkey.
  25. +Çelik, E., Eroğlu, B. & Selvi, M. (2012). The effect of problem based learning approach in       science education on students' academic achievement, and attitudes toward science       and technology course. Kastamonu Education Journal, 20(1), 187-202. Retrieved    from http://www.kefdergi.com/pdf/20_1/20_1_13.pdf.
  26. +Çiftçi, S., Meydan, A. & Ektem, I.S. (2008). The effect of Problem-based Learning to the       student’s level of achievement and attitude. Selcuk University Journal of Institute of       Social Sciences, 17, 179-190.
  27. Dağyar, M. (2014). The effects of problem based learning on academic achievement: A meta-      analysis study. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis), Hacettepe University, Turkey.
  28. De Coster, J. (2004). Meta-analysis notes. Retrieved from, www.stat-help.com/notes.
  29. Delisle, R. (1997). Use problem-based learning in the classroom. USA: ASCD.
  30. +Demirel, M. & Turan, M. (2010). The effects of problem based learning on achievement,       attitude, metacognitive awareness and motivation. Hacettepe University Journal of       Education, 38, 55-66. Retrieved from www.ulakbim.gov.tr.
  31. Demirel, Ö. (1999). Öğretme sanatı. [The art of teaching]. Ankara: Pegema.
  32. +Deveci, H. (2002). The effect of problem based learning to attitudes, success and retention       in social studies. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis), Anadolu University, Turkey.
  33. +Diggs, L. (1997). Student attitude toward and achievement in science in a problem based       learning educational experience. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis), University of       Missouri, Colombia.
  34. Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P. & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based       learning: A meta-analysis. Learn. Instr., 13(5), 533-568. doi:10.1016/S0959-      4752(02)00025-7.
  35. Dooley, C. (1997). Problem-centered learning experiences: Exploring past, present and future       perspectives, Reaper Review,19(4), 192-195. doi:10.1080/02783199709553827.
  36. Duch, B. J., Groh, S. E. & Alen, D.E. (2001). The power of problem-based learning, a practical “how to” for teaching undergraduate courses in any discipline. Sterling,       VA: Stylus.
  37. Duman Ç. Z. & Akbaş, H. (2010). Nursing students’ attitudes towards problem-based       learning. DEUHYO ED, 3(3), 146-152. Retrieved from       http://www.deu.edu.tr/UploadedFiles/Birimler/18278/146-152_pdf.pdf.
  38. Durlak, J.A. (1995). Reading and understanding multivariate statistics. Washington, DC:       American Psychological.
  39. Edens, K. M. (2000). Preparing problem solvers for the 21st century through problem-based       learning. College Teaching, 48(2), 55-60. doi:10.1080/87567550009595813.
  40. Ergene, T. (1999). Effectiveness of test anxiety reduction programs: A meta-analysis review.       (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis), Ohio University, USA.
  41. Fidan, N. (1996). Okulda öğrenme ve öğretme. [Teaching and learning in schools]. Ankara:       Alkım.
  42. Field, A. P. (2001). Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: a Monte Carlo comparison of  fixed-and random-effects methods. Psychological methods, 6(2), 161-180. Retrieved              from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.6.2.161.
  43. Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational       Researcher, 5(10) 3–8. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1174772.
  44. Glass, G. V., McGaw, B. & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly         Hills, CA: Sage.
  45. +Göğüş, R. (2013). Problem based learning teaching science and its effect on students       academic achievement and attitudes. (Unpublished Master Thesis), Kirikkale       University, Turkey.
  46. Gömleksiz, M. N. (2003). Validity and reliability of an attitude scale on affective domain in       English course. Firat University Journal of Social Science, (13)1, 215-226. Retrieved       from dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr.
  47. +Gülseçen, S. & Kubat, A. (2006). Teaching ICT to teacher candidates using PBL: A qualitative and quantitative evaluation. Educational Technology ve Society, 9(2), 96-               106.  Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.9.2.96.
  48. +Güneş, C. (2006). Studying the problem solving based learning method's effect on academic       achievement and attitude towards the lesson in endocrine systems unit. (Unpublished       Master Thesis), Gazi University, Turkey.
  49. +Günhan, B. & Başer, N. (2008). Probleme dayalı öğrenme yönteminin öğrencilerin       matematiğe yönelik tutumlarına ve başarılarına etkisi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi       Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8 (1), 119-134.
  50. Hastings, D. (2003). Case study: Problem based learning and the active classroom. Retrieved       from http://www.tag.ubc.ca/facdev/services/newsletter/97/active.html.
  51. Hedges, L. V. & Olkin, J. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, Florida:       Academic.
  52. Hmelo-Silver, C.E. (2004).  Problem based learning: What and how to students learn?       Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266. doi:       10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
  53. House, K. (2000). Mathematical problem solving in a grade 2 classroom. A Report of An       Internship, 52-57. 11. Memorial University of Newfoundland. Retrieved from       http://www.researchgate.net/publication/35736015.
  54. +Hwang, S. Y. & Kim, M. J. (2006). A comparison of problem based learning and lecture        based learning in an adult health nursing course. Nurse Education Today, 26, 315-321.       Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16364510.
  55. Ilgaz, G. (2006). The attitudes of seventh grade towards the science course and learning       strategy use. (Unpublished Master Thesis), Trakya University, Turkey.
  56. +İnce Aka, E. (2012). The effect of problem-based learning method used for teaching acids and bases on different variables and students views on the method. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis), Gazi University, Turkey.
  57. +İşeri Gökmen, S. (2008). Effects of problem based learning on students' environmental       attitude through local vs. non-local environmental problems. (Unpublished Master       Thesis), Middle East Technical University, Turkey.
  58. Johnstone, K. M. & Biggs, S. F. (1998). Problem-based learning: introduction, analysis, and       accounting curricula implications. Journal of Accounting Education. 16(3), 407-427.       doi:10.1016/S0748-5751(98)00026-8.
  59. Kaptan, F. & Korkmaz, H. (2001). Problem based learning approach in science education.       Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 20, 185-192. Retrieved from       ulakbim.gov.tr.
  60. +Karaöz, M. P. (2008). The effect of teaching the unit of ?power and motion? in primary       school science course using the problem based learning approach on students science       process skills, success and attitude. (Unpublished Master Thesis), Muğla     University,       Turkey.
  61. Kaufman, D. M. & Mann, K. V. (1997). Basic sciences in problem‐based learning and       conventional curricula: students' attitudes. Medical Education, 31(3), 177-180. DOI:       doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1997.tb02562.x.
  62. +Kazemi, F. & Ghoraishi, M. (2012). Comparison of problem-based learning approach and       traditional teaching on attitude, misconceptions and mathematics performance of       University Students . Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46,  3852 - 3856.       doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.159.
  63. Kenn, M. (1996). Problem based learning, issues of teaching and learning. Retrieved from      http://csd.uwa.edu.au/newsletter.
  64. Kocakaya, S. (2011). An educational dilemma: Are educational experiments working?       Educational Research and Reviews, 6(1), 110-123. Retrieved from       http://www.academicjournals.org/journal/ERR/article-abstract/8AF28104437.
  65. +Koçak, M. & Ünlü, M. (2013). The effects of problem based learning on student's   performance and motivation in geographic teaching. Marmara Geographic Journal, 1-17. Retrieved from       http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/marucog/article/view/-  1012000793/0.
  66. +Koçakoğlu, M. (2008). The effect of problem based learning and motivational styles on       students' academic success and attitudes towards biology course. (Unpublished       Doctoral Thesis), Gazi University, Turkey.
  67. +Kuşdemir, M., Ay, Y. & Tüysüz, C. (2013). An analysis of the effect of problem based learning model on the 10th grade students’ achievement, attitude and motivation in the unit of “mixtures”. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, (7)2, 195-224. Retrieved from http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/balikesirnef/article/viewFile/5000084874/5000078956
  68. Leary, H. M., (2012). Self-directed learning in problem-based learning versus traditional       lecture-based learning: A meta-analysis. All Graduate Theses and Dissertations.       Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/1173.
  69. Lewis, K. E. & Tamblyn, R. M. (1987). The problem-based learning approach in        baccalaureate nursing education: How effective is it? Nursing Paper, 19(2), 17-26.
  70. +Marum, T. (2009). PBL vs. DI: Which increases student achievement and attitude?       (Unpublished Master       Thesis), Western Governors University, USA.
  71. Mierson, S. & Parikh, A. A. (2000). Stories from the field: Problem-based learning from a       teacher's and a student's perspective. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning,     32(1), 20-27. doi:10.1080/00091380009602705.
  72. +Moralar, A. (2012). The effect of problem-based learning approach on academic success,       attitude and motivation in science education. (Unpublished Master Thesis), Trakya       University, Turkey.
  73. Oskay-Özyalçın, Ö., Erdem, E. & Yılmaz, A. (2009). A study about the effects of chemistry       laboratory applications on students' attitudes towards chemistry and achievement.       Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 8(27), 222-321. Retrieved from       dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/esosder/article.
  74. +Özdil, G. (2011). Effects of problem based learning approach on students? success in       teaching the concepts of area and perimeter in seventh grade in primary schools.       (Unpublished Master Thesis), Kastamonu University, Turkey.
  75. +Özgen, K. (2007). The effects of problem based learning approach on learning products in       mathematics lesson. (Unpublished Master Thesis), Dicle University, Turkey.
  76. Özmen, F. (1999). Importance affective domain in realization of effective education - Love based training. Firat University Journal of Social Science, 1(9), 193-198. Retrieved   from http://web.firat.edu.tr/sosyalbil/dergi/arsiv/cilt9/sayi1/193-198.pdf.
  77. +Özsarı, T. (2009). The effect of cooperative learning method to the fourth grade students'       achievement on mathematic learning: Problem based learning (PBL) and student   teams      achievement division method (STAD). (Unpublished Master Thesis), Ege    University, Turkey.
  78. +Penjvini, S. & Shahsawari, S. (2013). Comparing problem based learning with lecture          based    learning on medicine giving skill to newborn in nursing students. Journal of   Nursing    Education and Practice, 9(3), 53-59. doi: 10.5430/jnep.v3n9p53.
  79. Phan, H. P. (2008). Unifying different theories of learning: Theoretical framework and       empirical evidence. Educational Psychology, 28(3), 325-340.       doi:10.1080/01443410701591392.
  80. Pigott, T. D. (2012). Advances in meta-analysis. Springer: USA.
  81. Radin, D. I. & Ferrari, D. C. (1991). Effects of consciousness on the fall of dice: A meta-      analysis. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 5(1), 61-83. Retrieved from       http://deanradin.com/evidence/Radin1991DiceMA.pdf.
  82. +Rajab, A. M. (2007). The effects of problem-based learning on the self-efficacy and attitudes       of beginning biology majors. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis), University of California,       USA.
  83. +Reynolds, J. M. & Hancock, D. R. (2010). Problem-based learning in a higher education       environmental biotechnology course, Innovations in Education and Teaching       International, 47(2), 175-186. doi: 10.1080/14703291003718919.
  84. Rudy, A. C. (2001). A Meta-analysis of the treatment of anorexia nervosa. (Unpublished       Doctoral Thesis), Ithaca College, USA.
  85. Saban, A. (2004). Öğrenme-öğretme süreci. Yeni teori ve yaklaşımlar. [Teaching-learning       process. New theories and approaches]. Ankara: Gazi.
  86. Sağlam, M. & Yüksel, İ. (2007). Meta-analysis and meta-evaluation methods in program       evaluation. Dumlupinar University Journal of Social Science, 18, 175-188. Retrieved       from       http://birimler.dpu.edu.tr/app/views/panel/ckfinder/userfiles/17/files/DERG_/-      18/175-188.pdf.
  87. Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions.       Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 3. doi: 10.7771/1541-      5015.10
  88. Schwarts, P., Mennin, S. & Webb, G. (Eds.) (2001). Problem-based learning: Case studies,       experience and practice. London: Kogan Page.
  89. +Selçuk-Sezgin, G. (2010). The effects of problem-based learning on pre-service teachers’       achievement, approaches and attitudes towards learning physics. International Journal       of the Physical Sciences, 5(6), 711-723. Retrieved from       http://www.academicjournals.org/IJPS.
  90. +Serin, G. (2009). The effect of problem based learning instruction on 7th grade students’       science achievement, attitude toward science and scientific process skills.       (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis), Middle East Technical University, Turkey.
  91. +Sevening, D. & Baron, M. (2003). A comparison of traditional teaching methods and       problem-based learning in an addiction studies class. Journal of Teaching in the       Addictions, 1(2), 27-42. doi: 10.1300/J188v01n02_04.
  92. Sifoğlu, N. (2007). The effects of constructivism and problem-based learning on students'       success in the teaching the topic heritage' at the 8th grade. (Unpublished Master       Thesis), Gazi       University, Turkey.
  93. Strobel, J. & Van Barneveld, A. (2009). When is PBL more effective? A meta-synthesis of       meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal             of Problem-based Learning, 3(1), 44-58. doi: 10.7771/1541-5015.1046.
  94. +Şahin, M. & Yörek, N. (2009). A comparison of problem-based learning and traditional       lecture students’ expectations and course grades in an introductory physics classroom.       Scientific Research and Essay, 4(8), 753-762. Retrieved from        http://www.academicjournals.org/SRE.
  95. +Şalgam, E. (2009). The effect of problem based learning method on students' academic       achievement and their attitude for physics lesson. (Unpublished Master Thesis),      Dokuz       Eylul University, Turkey.
  96. Şendağ, S. & Odabaşı, F. H. (2009). Effects of an online problem based learning course on       content knowledge acquisition and critical thinking skills. Computers and Education,       53(1), 132-141. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.008.
  97. +Şenocak, E., Taşkesenligil, Y. & Sözbilir, M. (2007). A study on teaching gases to    prospective primary science teachers thorugh problem-based learning. Research in            Science Education, 37, 279-290. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu.
  98. +Taşoğlu, A. K. (2009). The effect of problem based learning on students? achievements,       scientific process skills and attitudes towards problem solving in physics education.       (Unpublished Master       Thesis), Dokuz Eylul University, Turkey).
  99. +Tavukcu, K. (2006). The effects on the learning outcomes of problem based learning in       science instruction. (Unpublished Master Thesis), Zonguldak Karaelmas University,       Turkey.
  100. Tolan, B. (1985). Toplum bilimlerine giriş: Sosyoloji ve sosyal psikoloji. [Introduction to the       social sciences: Sociology and social psychology]. Ankara: Savaş.
  101. Topçu, P. (2009). The effect of gender on computer attitude: A meta-analysis study.       (Unpublished Master Thesis), Marmara University, Turkey.
  102. +Tozo, A. T. (2011). The evaluation of the affect on student success and attitude of the       subject which is Turkey's geopolitical position and regional problems via problem based learning technique. (Unpublished Master Thesis), Gazi University, Turkey.
  103. Tseng, K. H., Chiang, F. K. & Hsu, W. H. (2008). Interactive processes and learning attitudes in a web-based problem-based learning (PBL) platform. Computers in       Human Behavior, 24(3), 940-955. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.02.023.
  104. +Tüysüz, C., Tatar, E. & Kuşdemir, M. (2010). Effect of the problem based learning on       students' achievement and attitude in chemistry. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of       Social Sciences Institute, 7(13), 48–55. Retrieved from       http://sbed.mku.edu.tr/article/view/1038000590/0.
  105. Uden, L. (2006). Technology and problem-based learning. C. Beaumont (Ed.). USA: IGI       Global.
  106. +Uslu, G. (2006). The Effect of problem based learning to attitudes, success and level of       performance of the students in secondary school mathematics lessons.       (Unpublished Master Thesis), Balikesir University, Turkey.
  107. +Uygun, N. & Tertemiz, N. (2014). Effects of problem-based learning on student attitudes,       achievement and retention of learning in math course. Education and Science,       39(174), 75-90. doi: 10.15390/EB.2014.1975.
  108. Üstün, U. (2012). To what extent is problem based learning effective as compared to       traditional teaching in science education? A meta-analysis study. (Unpublished       Doctoral Thesis), Middle East Technical University, Turkey.
  109. Üstün, U. & Eryılmaz, A. (2014). A research method to do effective research synthesis :        Meta-analysis. Education and Science, 174(39), 1-32. doi: 10.15390/EB.2014.3379.
  110. +Visser, Y. (2002). Effects of problem-based and lecture-based instructional strategies on       problem solving performance and learner attitudes in a high school genetics class. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research           Association, New Orleans.
  111. Walker, A. & Leary, H. (2009). A problem based learning meta analysis: Differences across       problem types, implementation types, disciplines, and assessment levels.       Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 3(1), 6-28. Retrieved from       http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1061.
  112. Walton, H. J. & Matthews, M. B. (1989). Essentials of problem-based learning. Medical       Education, 23, 542-558. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1989.tb01581.x.
  113. Wilson, S. J., Lipsey, M. W. & Derzon, J. H. (2003). The effects of school-based           intervention programs on aggressive behavior: a meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting          and Clinical Psychology, 71(1), 136-151. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.71.1.136.
  114. Wolf, F. M. (1986). Meta-analysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis. USA: Sage.
  115. Woods, D.R. (1996). Problem based learning, helping your student gain the most from PBL.       USA: Sage.
  116. Yadav, A., Subedi, D., Lundeberg, M. A. & Bunting, C. F. (2011). Problem-based Learning:       Influence on Students’ Learning in an Electrical Engineering Course. Journal of       Engineering Education, 100 (2), 253-280. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00013.x
  117. +Yurd, M. (2007). The effect of know-want-sample-learn strategy, which is developed by     using problem based learning and know-want-learn strategy, towards the 5th grade       students' attitudes in science and technology lesson and towards to remove their       misconceptions. (Unpublished Master Thesis), Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.