Journal Menu
Submit Manuscript via ScholarOne

EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education
Volume 13, Issue 2 (February 2017) - Special Issue on Learning strategies in engineering education using Virtual and Augmented Reality Technologies, pp. 469-486

DOI: 10.12973/eurasia.2017.00626a

Downloaded 2919 times.

Research Article

Published online on Dec 02, 2016

How to reference this article?


Virtual Technologies Trends in Education

Jorge Martín-Gutiérrez, Carlos Efrén Mora, Beatriz Añorbe-Díaz & Antonio González-Marrero


Virtual reality captures people’s attention. This technology has been applied in many sectors such as medicine, industry, education, video games, or tourism. Perhaps its biggest area of interest has been leisure and entertainment. Regardless the sector, the introduction of virtual or augmented reality had several constraints: it was expensive, it had poor ergonomics, or implied too much work to create contents. Recent technological innovations, including the rapid adoption of smartphones by society, have facilitated the access to virtual reality and augmented reality of anyone. In addition, several large companies like Apple, Facebook, Samsung, and Magic Leap, among others, have increased their investment to make these technologies to improve their accessibility within the next few years. Educational institutions will benefit from better accessibility to virtual technologies; this will make it possible to teach in virtual environments that are impossible to visualize in physical classrooms, like accessing into virtual laboratories, visualizing machines, industrial plants, or even medical scenarios. The huge possibilities of accessible virtual technologies will make it possible to break the boundaries of formal education.

Keywords: Virtual reality, Augmented reality, Virtual Learning Environment, Educational Technology

  1. ARiSE Project (2006-2008). Retrieved June 24, 2016 from
  2. Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., Graf, S., & Kinshuk. (2014). Augmented Reality Trends in Education: A Systematic Review of Research and Applications. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 133–149.
  3. Bamodu, O., & Ye, X. M. (2013). Virtual Reality and Virtual Reality System Components. In Advanced Materials Research 765, 1169-1172.
  4. Benford, S., Greenhalgh, C., Reynard, G., Brown, C., & Koleva, B. (1998). Understanding and constructing shared spaces with mixed-reality boundaries. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 5(3), 185–223. doi: 10.1145/292834.292836.
  5. Billinghurst, M., Kato, H., & Poupyrev, I. (2001). The MagicBook: a transitional AR inteface. Computers & Graphics25(5), 745-753.
  6. Björk, S., Holopainen, J. (2004). Patterns in Game Design. Charles River Media, Boston, MA.
  7. Boulos, M. N. K., Hetherington, L., & Wheeler, S. (2007). Second life: An overview of the potential of 3-D virtual worlds in medical and health education. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 24(4), 233-245. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2007.00733.x
  8. Buckingham, D., & Rodríguez, C. (2013). Learning about Power and Citizenship in an Online Virtual World. Comunicar20(40), 49-58. doi:10.3916/C40-2013-02-05.
  9. Cellan-Jones, R. (2016). 2016: the year when VR goes from virutal to reality. Retrieved July 5, 2016 from
  10. Chen, C. M., & Tsai Y. N. (2012). Interactive augmented reality system for enhancing library instruction in elementary schools. Computers & Education, 59(2), 638–652. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.001.
  11. Chou, C. (1998). The effectiveness of using multimedia computer simulations coupled with social constructivist pedagogy in a college introductory physics classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Teachers College-Columbia University, New York.
  12. CONNECT Project  (2005-2007). Retrieved June 18, 2016 from
  13. Connolly, E., & Hoskins, J. (2014). Using iPads to Teach Year 7 Induction with Aurasma. The School Librarian62(1), 6.
  14. CREATE project (2004). Retrieved June 18, 2016 from
  15. Dale, E. (1969). Audio-visual methods in teaching. New York: Dryden.
  16. Digi-Capital (2016). VR/AR investment in 2015 breaks out near $700 million. Available on: (
  17. Di Serio, Á., Ibáñez, M. B., & Kloos, C. D. (2013). Impact of an augmented reality system on students' motivation for a visual art course. Computers & Education68, 586-596.
  18. Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 7–22. doi: 10.1007/s10956-008-9119-1.
  19. Ezawa, K. (January 2016). Virtual & Augmented Reality. In Investment Themes in 2016. In: Citi Global Perspectives & Solution. Citigroup Inc. Retrieved June 15, 2016 m from
  20. Feng, Z., Duh, H. B.L., & Billinghurst, M. (2008). Trends in augmented reality tracking, interaction and display: A review of ten years of ISMAR. Paper presented at the7th IEEE/ACM international symposium on mixed and augmented reality (ISMAR), Cambridge, UK. doi: 10.1109/ISMAR.2008.4637362.
  21. Ferry, B., Kervin, L., Turbill, J., Cambourne, B., Hedberg, J., Jonassen, D., & Puglisi, S. (2004). The design of an online classroom simulation to enhance the decision making skills of beginning teachers. Australian Association for Research in Education. Retrieved June 16, 2016, from
  22. Fildes, N. (2015). 2016 is the year that VR will take off. . Retrieved June 18, 2016 from
  23. Fowler, C. (2015). Virtual reality and learning: Where is the pedagogy? British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 412-422. doi:10.1111/bjet.12135.
  24. Gutiérrez, J. M., Domínguez, M. G., & González, C. R. (2015). Using 3D Virtual Technologies to Train Spatial Skills in Engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education 31(1), 323-334.
  25. Harris, K., & Reid, D. (2005). The influence of virtual reality play on children's motivation. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy72(1), 21-29.
  26. Höllerer, T., & Feiner, S. (2004). Mobile augmented reality. Telegeoinformatics: Location-Based Computing and Services. Taylor and Francis Books Ltd., London, UK, 21.
  27. Holley, D., Hobbs, M., & Menown, C. (2016). The Augmented Library: Motivating STEM Students. Networks19, 77-84.
  28. Hsieh, M. C., & Lin, H. C. K. (2011). A Conceptual Study for Augmented Reality E-learning System Based on Usability Evaluation. CISME, 1(8), 5–7. doi:10.5963/CISME0108002.
  29. Jarmon, L., Traphagan, T., Mayrath, M., & Trivedi, A. (2009). Virtual world teaching, experiential learning, and assessment: An interdisciplinary communication course in Second Life. Computers & Education53(1), 169-182.
  30. Kaufmann, H., Steinbugl, K., Dunser, A. & Gluck J. (2005). General training of spatial abilities by geometry education in augmented reality. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 8(4), 330.
  31. Kerawalla, L., Luckin, R., Seljeflot, S., & Woolard, A. (2006). Making it real: Exploring the potential of augmented reality for teaching primary school science. Virtual Reality (Waltham Cross), 10(3-4), 163–174. doi:10.1007/s10055-006-0036-4.
  32. Kotranza, A., Lind, D. S., Pugh, C. M., & Lok, B. (2009, October). Real-time in-situ visual feedback of task performance in mixed environments for learning joint psycho-motor-cognitive tasks. Paper presented at the 8th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), Orlando, FL.
  33. Kuei-Shu, H., Jinn-Feng, J., Hung-Yuan, W., & Tsung-Han, L. (2016) Application of the Environmental Sensation Learning Vehicle Simulation Platform in Virtual Reality. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education 12(5), 1477-1485. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2016.1525a.
  34. Lange, B. S., Requejo, P., Flynn, S. M., Rizzo, A. A., Valero-Cuevas, F. J., Baker, L., & Winstein, C. (2010). The potential of virtual reality and gaming to assist successful aging with disability. Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America, 21(2), 339-356
  35. Le, Q. T., Pedro, A., & Park, C. S. (2014). A social virtual reality based construction safety education system for experiential learning. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 79(3-4), 487-506. doi:10.1007/s10846-014-0112-z.
  36. Ludwig, C., & Reimann, C. (2005). Augmented reality: Information at focus. Cooperative Computing & Communication Laboratory, 4(1). Universitat Paderborn.
  37. Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education, 56, 429-440. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004.
  38. Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Saorín, J. L., Contero, M., Alcaniz, M., Pérez-López, D. C., & Ortega, M. (2010). Design and validation of an augmented book for spatial abilities development in engineering students. Computers & Graphics, 34(1), 77–91. doi:10.1016/j.cag.2009.11.003.
  39. Martín Gutiérrez, J., & Meneses Fernández, M. D. (2014). Applying Augmented Reality in Engineering Education to Improve Academic Performance & Student Motivation. International Journal of Engineering Education30(3), 625-635.
  40. McKerlich, R., Riis, M., Anderson, T., & Eastman, B. (2011). Student perceptions of teaching presence, social presence and cognitive presence in a virtual world. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching7(3), 324.
  41. Meta. “Meet Meta”, [Online]. Retrieved June 8, 2016 from
  42. Mikropoulos, T., Chalkidis, A., Katskikis, A., & Emvalotis, A. (1998). Students’ attitudes towards educational virtual environments. Education and Information Technologies, 3(2), 137-148.
  43. Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems, 77(12), 1321-1329.
  44. Parton, B. S., & Hancock, R. (2012). Animating the Inanimate using Aurasma: Applications for Deaf students. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 1, 3743-3745.
  45. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. doi:10.1108/10748120110424816.
  46. Riva, G. (2006). Virtual reality. Encyclopaedia of Biomedical Engineering. London: John Wiley & Sons.
  47. Rosemblum L. J. Cross R. A. (1997). The challenge of virtual reality. In W. R. Earnshaw, J. Vince, H. Jones (Eds.), Visualization & Modeling (pp. 325–399). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  48. Sag, A. (2016). 2016 Could be Nvidia´s “Virtual Reality Year”. Retrieved July 5, 2016 from
  49. Sotiriou, S. & Bogner, F. X. (2008). Visualizing the invisible: Augmented reality as an innovative science education scheme. Advanced Science Letters, 1(1), 114–122. doi:10.1166/asl.2008.012.
  50. Steinberg, R. N. (2000). Computers in teaching science: To simulate or not to simulate? Physics Edu-cation Research, American Journal of Physics Supplement 68(7), and S37-S41.
  51. Tilley, A. (February 2016). Augmented Reality Startup Magic Leap Closes $794 Million Investment As It Enters Pilot Production Phase. Retrieved June 18, 2016 from
  52. Winn, W. (1993). A conceptual basis for educational applications of virtual reality (Technical Report TR-93-9). Seattle, Washington: Human Interface Technology Laboratory, University of Washington. Retrieved from
  53. Winn, W. (2002). Research into practice: Current trends in educational technology research: The study of learning environments. Educational Psychology Review14(3), 331-351.
  54. Wu, F., Liu, Z., Wang, J., & Zhao, Y. (2015, March). Establishment virtual maintenance environment based on VIRTOOLS to effectively enhance the sense of immersion of teaching equipment. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Education Technology, Management and Humanities Science (ETMHS 2015). Atlantis Press. doi:10.2991/etmhs-15.2015.93.
  55. Zacharia, Z. (2003). Using interactive simulations to enhance students’ explanations regarding physical phenomena. Computer based learning.3 (B), 472–476.
  56. Zhou, F., Duh, H. L., & Billinghurst, M. (2008). Trends in augmented reality traching, iteraction nd display: A review of ten years in ISMAR. Proceedings of the Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR 7th IEE/ACM International Symposium (pp. 193-202). Cambridge: IEEE.