Journal Menu
Submit Manuscript via ScholarOne

EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education
Volume 13, Issue 2 (February 2017) - Special Issue on Learning strategies in engineering education using Virtual and Augmented Reality Technologies, pp. 503-520

DOI: 10.12973/eurasia.2017.00628a

Downloaded 1653 times.

Research Article

Published online on Dec 02, 2016

How to reference this article?

 

The Use of Augmented Reality in Formal Education: A Scoping Review

Fatih Saltan & Ömer Arslan

Abstract

Augmented Reality (AR) is recognized as one of the most important developments in educational technology for both higher and K-12 education as emphasized in Horizon report (Johnson et al., 2016, 2015). Furthermore, AR is expected to achieve widespread adoption that will take two to three years in higher education and four to five years in K-12 education (Johnson et al., 2016, 2012). If this is the current state of the art for the use of AR in education, it is important to investigate how educators and researchers integrate AR into teaching-learning processes. Looking from such a glimpse, the purpose of this scoping review was to provide a comprehensive overview of relevant research regarding the emergence of augmented reality, the links to pedagogy and educational outcomes, specifically in the context of formal education. The scoping review is underpinned by the five-stage framework Arksey and O’Malley (2005). First, research questions are identified. Second, the last five years in ERIC database is explored by using the search term ‘augmented reality.’ Third, studies are investigated through inclusion and exclusion criteria, and PRISMA (2009) model is utilized for article selection. Fourth, selected articles are charted with respect to numerous dimensions and summaries. Finally, findings are reported in the light of research questions. The findings of the scoping review illustrated a set of studies that provide evidence of improved academic performance, increase in students’ engagement, motivation, and satisfaction through the educational environments that are enriched with AR applications. The findings of the scoping review are discussed with respect to multiple dimensions that are explored under research questions.

Keywords: augmented reality, scoping review, higher education, K-12, formal education.


References
  1. Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19-32.
  2. Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and virtual environments, 6(4), 355-385.
  3. Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., & MacIntyre, B. (2001). Recent advances in augmented reality. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE, 21(6), 34-47.
  4. Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., & Graf, S. (2014). Augmented reality trends in education: a systematic review of research and applications. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 133.
  5. Berryman, D. R. (2012). Augmented reality: a review. Medical reference services quarterly31(2), 212-218.
  6. Borrero, A. M., & Márquez, J. A. (2012). A pilot study of the effectiveness of augmented reality to enhance the use of remote labs in electrical engineering education. Journal of science education and technology, 21(5), 540-557.
  7. Bower, M., Howe, C., McCredie, N., Robinson, A., & Grover, D. (2014). Augmented Reality in education–cases, places and potentials. Educational Media International51(1), 1-15.
  8. Bressler, D. M., & Bodzin, A. M. (2013). A mixed methods assessment of students' flow experiences during a mobile augmented reality science game. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 505-517.
  9. Carbonell Carrera, C., & Bermejo Asensio, L. A. (2016). Augmented reality as a digital teaching environment to develop spatial thinking. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 1-12.
  10. Chang, Y. H., & Jen-ch'iang, L. I. U. (2013). Applying an AR Technique to Enhance Situated Heritage Learning in a Ubiquitous Learning Environment. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology12(3), 21-32.
  11. Chang, H. Y., Wu, H. K., & Hsu, Y. S. (2013). Integrating a mobile augmented reality activity to contextualize student learning of a socioscientific issue. British Journal of Educational Technology44(3), E95-E99.
  12. Chen, C. P., & Wang, C. H. (2015). Employing Augmented-Reality-Embedded Instruction to Disperse the Imparities of Individual Differences in Earth Science Learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(6), 835-847.
  13. Civelek, T., Ucar, E., Ustunel, H., & Aydın, M. K. (2014). Effects of a Haptic Augmented Simulation on K-12 Students’ Achievement and their Attitudes towards Physics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(6), 565-574.
  14. Crandall, P. G., Engler, R. K., Beck, D. E., Killian, S. A., O'Bryan, C. A., Jarvis, N., & Clausen, E. (2015). Development of an Augmented Reality Game to Teach Abstract Concepts in Food Chemistry. Journal of Food Science Education14(1), 18-23.
  15. Estapa, A., & Nadolny, L. (2015). The Effect of an Augmented Reality Enhanced Mathematics Lesson on Student Achievement and Motivation. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 16(3), 40.
  16. Ferrer-Torregrosa, J., Torralba, J., Jimenez, M. A., García, S., & Barcia, J. M. (2015). ARBOOK: Development and Assessment of a Tool Based on Augmented Reality for Anatomy. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(1), 119-124.
  17. Garrett, B. M., Jackson, C., & Wilson, B. (2015). Augmented reality m-learning to enhance nursing skills acquisition in the clinical skills laboratory. Interactive Technology and Smart Education12(4), 298-314.
  18. Goodwin, B., & Miller, K. (2013). Evidence on flipped classrooms is still coming in. Educational Leadership70(6), 78-80.
  19. Han, J., Jo, M., Hyun, E., & So, H. J. (2015). Examining young children’s perception toward augmented reality-infused dramatic play. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(3), 455-474.
  20. Hsiao, H. S., Chang, C. S., Lin, C. Y., & Wang, Y. Z. (2016). Weather observers: a manipulative augmented reality system for weather simulations at home, in the classroom, and at a museum. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(1), 205-223.
  21. Hwang, G. J., Wu, P. H., Chen, C. C., & Tu, N. T. (2015). Effects of an augmented reality-based educational game on students' learning achievements and attitudes in real-world observations. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-12.
  22. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., and Freeman, A. (2015). NMC Horizon Report: 2015 K-12 Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
  23. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., and Hall, C. (2016). NMC Horizon Report: 2016 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
  24. Kaufmann, H., & Dünser, A. (2007, July). Summary of usability evaluations of an educational augmented reality application. In International Conference on Virtual Reality (pp. 660-669). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  25. Koutromanos, G., Sofos, A., & Avraamidou, L. (2015). The use of augmented reality games in education: a review of the literature. Educational Media International52(4), 253-271.
  26. Lee, K. (2012). Augmented reality in education and training. TechTrends, 56(2), 13-21.
  27. Lu, S. J., & Liu, Y. C. (2015). Integrating augmented reality technology to enhance children’s learning in marine education. Environmental Education Research, 21(4), 525-541.
  28. Martin-Gonzalez, A., Chi-Poot, A., & Uc-Cetina, V. (2015). Usability evaluation of an augmented reality system for teaching Euclidean vectors. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(6), 627-636.
  29. Martins, V. F., Gomes, L., & de Paiva Guimarães, M. (2015). Challenges and Possibilities of Use of Augmented Reality in Education. In Computational Science and Its Applications--ICCSA 2015 (pp. 223-233). Springer International Publishing.
  30. McMahon, D., Cihak, D. F., & Wright, R. (2015). Augmented reality as a navigation tool to employment opportunities for postsecondary education students with intellectual disabilities and autism. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(3), 157-172.
  31. O'Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education25, 85-95.
  32. Pérez-López, D., & Contero, M. (2013). Delivering educational multimedia contents through an augmented reality application: A case study on its impact on knowledge acquisition and retention. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(4), 19-28.
  33. Radu, I. (2012). Why should my students use AR? A comparative review of the educational impacts of augmented-reality. Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR) (pp. 313–314).
  34. Radu, I. (2014). Augmented reality in education: a meta-review and cross-media analysis. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing18(6), 1533-1543.
  35. Santos, M. E. C., Chen, A., Taketomi, T., Yamamoto, G., Miyazaki, J., & Kato, H. (2014). Augmented reality learning experiences: Survey of prototype design and evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 7(1), 38–56.
  36. Tanner, P., Karas, C., & Schofield, D. (2014). Augmenting a child’s reality: using educational tablet technology. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 13, 45-54.
  37. Thornton, T., Ernst, J. V., & Clark, A. C. (2012). Augmented reality as a visual and spatial learning tool in technology education. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 71(8), 18-21.
  38. Van Arnhem, J. P., & Spiller, J. M. (2014). Augmented reality for discovery and instruction. Journal of Web Librarianship8(2), 214-230.
  39. Vaughan-Nichols, S. J. (2009). Augmented reality: No longer a novelty? Computer, 12, 19-22.
  40. Wang, H. Y., Duh, H. B. L., Li, N., Lin, T. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2014). An investigation of university students’ collaborative inquiry learning behaviors in an augmented reality simulation and a traditional simulation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(5), 682-691.
  41. Zarraonandia, T., Aedo, I., Díaz, P., & Montero, A. (2013). An augmented lecture feedback system to support learner and teacher communication. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 616-628.